, ,

Ohio Candidates Can’t Hide Behind Anti-Tax-Pledge Statute

To hold their elected officials accountable, a conglomerate of conservative, libertarian, and tea-party groups representing Ohio taxpayers have recently devised two pledges for state legislative candidates. These pledges are directed toward educating Ohio voters as to who can be counted on to limit onerous taxation and regulation.

Specifically, the taxpayers call upon legislative candidates to pledge that they (1) will not vote in a manner inconsistent with health care freedom; and (2) will note vote to impose a severance tax on fledgling oil and gas production in Ohio.

As citizens began to ask candidates to sign this pledge, something interesting – – beyond a policy debate – – happened: some Republican candidates began to balk at the idea of a pledge.

Rather than take a stance, some candidates have even responded that the request that they take the pledge is illegal, and that the person asking them to sign it could be fined out of house and home.

While it’s unclear how vastly this view is held amongst the Ohio Republican Caucus, or Democrats, for that matter, two things are clear: (1) it’s not a violation of a law to ask one’s candidate to sign the pledge; and (2) the statute is, itself, flagrantly unconstitutional.

Read the full analysis HERE.

2 replies

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. […] the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law released a white-paper that addresses the issue of squishy legislators that say they can’t sign pledges because […]

  2. […] Well, of course it is. The silly statute they have cited is entirely unconstitutional and the 1851 Center for Constitutional Law did a great job of blowing that statute to pieces and calling out the Ohio legislators who sought […]

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply